Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Xeon E3-1270 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3868 days newer than Xeon E3-1270.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 32% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E3-1270 - 205 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
205
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.02/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$414
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$414 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |