Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1080 days newer than Xeon E3-1270 v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 80 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 179 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 24 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
179
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1074.19
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,074.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17394 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |