Buy on Amazon
CA$388
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2524 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Ready or Not than Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 274 vs 258 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 20 vs 8 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
274
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.42/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$388
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for CA$388 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E3-1265L v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
