Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3138 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 17% better in War Thunder than Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 192 vs 164 FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
192
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 232 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |