Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Xeon E3-1241 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2795 days newer than Xeon E3-1241 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 7% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E3-1241 v3 - 132 vs 123 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
132
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • May 11th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |