Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3929 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 4% better in Dishonored 2 than Xeon E3-1240 - 267 vs 256 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
267
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |