Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1226 v3 outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1226 v3 is 1883 days older than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3
- Performs up to 0% better in Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen 3 3200G - 254 vs 253 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3 - 65 vs 84 Watts
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
253
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$127.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$127.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • May 11th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell, Haswell-WS | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |