Buy on Amazon
CA$110
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $450
Availability
MSRP in USD: $450
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 2662 days newer than Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 14% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-3820 - 209 vs 183 FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 45 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
183
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$110
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-3820 Quad-Core Processor 3.6 GHz 10 MB Cache LGA 2011 - BX80619I73820
Buy for CA$110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
|---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Core i7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
