Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1620 outperforms Pentium G620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1620 is 561 days newer than Pentium G620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Performs up to 0% better in Death Stranding than Pentium G620 - 213 vs 212 FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Pentium G620 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
213
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$32.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G620 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
May 22nd, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |