Buy on Amazon
CA$88.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4400.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - CA$88.88 vs CA$659.99
- Up to 86% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i9-10900 - CA$0.43 vs CA$2.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 6% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Pentium G4400 - 221 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 20 vs 2 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
208
94.11764705882352%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$88.88
100%
Value Winner
Intel BX80662G4400 Pentium Processor G4400, 3.3 GHz
Buy for CA$88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5600 minutes ago
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
221
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.99/FPS
14.381270903010032%
Price, CA$
CA$659.99
13%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900 Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for CA$659.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5604 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
694
40.72769953051643%
Multi-Core
1184
14.060087875549222%
Intel Pentium G4400 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 2 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
