Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 320 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 4% better in Minecraft than Core i3-10105F - 739 vs 713 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - CA$99.99 vs CA$419.88
- Up to 75% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i9-10900 - CA$0.14 vs CA$0.55 per FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
739
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.55/FPS
25%
Price, CA$
CA$419.88
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$419.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
713
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$99.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |