Buy on Amazon
CA$36.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4400.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - CA$36.99 vs CA$330.0
- Up to 89% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i7-10700K - CA$0.17 vs CA$1.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Pentium G4400 - 220 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 16 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
212
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel BX80662G4400 Pentium Processor G4400, 3.3 GHz
Buy for CA$36.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
Core i7-10700K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
220
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.5/FPS
11%
Price, CA$
CA$330
11%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-10700K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.1 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W (BX8070110700K)
Buy for CA$330 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i7-10700K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4400 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
