Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4400.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - CA$39.99 vs CA$339.56
- Up to 87% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-11600KF - CA$0.15 vs CA$1.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 10% better in F1 22 than Pentium G4400 - 286 vs 259 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 12 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
259
90.55944055944056%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58289 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
286
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.19/FPS
12.605042016806722%
Price, CA$
CA$339.56
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$339.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58290 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
694
31.602914389799636%
Multi-Core
1184
13.59825427816699%
Intel Pentium G4400 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |