Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3025 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Celeron G1620 - 192 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - CA$32.99 vs CA$248.99
- Up to 87% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i5-11600KF - CA$0.17 vs CA$1.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
192
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.3/FPS
13.076923076923078%
Price, CA$
CA$248.99
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$248.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
189
98.4375%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$32.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |