Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2198 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3250.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - CA$120.99 vs CA$572.28
- Up to 78% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-10850K - CA$0.83 vs CA$3.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 53 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than Pentium G3250 - 154 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 20 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
145
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$120.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$120.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
154
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.72/FPS
22%
Price, CA$
CA$572.28
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$572.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3250 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |