Buy on Amazon
CA$88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3250 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G3250 is 636 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-4300 - 170 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 59% cheaper than Pentium G3250 - CA$36.09 vs CA$88.0
- Up to 58% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Pentium G3250 - CA$0.22 vs CA$0.52 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 4 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
170
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.52/FPS
42.30769230769231%
Price, CA$
CA$88
41%
FPS Winner
Intel PENTIUM Processor G3250 3.20 2 LGA 1156 BX80646G3250
Buy for CA$88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2666 minutes ago
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
167
98.23529411764706%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.09
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-4300 CPU Used 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 3.8 GHz 4M 95W Socket AM3+
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2664 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3250 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Pentium | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
