Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - CA$36.09 vs CA$96.0
- Up to 58% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i3-10105F - CA$0.33 vs CA$0.79 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 11% better in Elden Ring than FX-4300 - 122 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
110
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13568 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
122
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.79/FPS
41%
Price, CA$
CA$96
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13567 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |