Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3220T outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3220T is 552 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3220T
- Performs up to 1% better in Ready or Not than FX-6200 - 235 vs 232 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3220T - 6 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Pentium G3220T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3220T | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Pentium | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 3 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
