Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Pentium 3556U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 125 days older than Pentium 3556U.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 3556U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium 3556U - 115 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium 3556U - 6 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 3556U | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |