Buy on Amazon
CA$80.8
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9960X outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9960X is 2564 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9960X
- Performs up to 19% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-6100 - 106 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-9960X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-Series FX-6100 FX6100 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD6100WMW6KGU FD6100WMGUSBX
Buy for CA$80.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76966 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-9960X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9960X | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Core i9 | Collection | FX |
| Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
