Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 559 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 6% better in Diablo IV than Core i3-10320 - 217 vs 204 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - CA$257.31 vs CA$659.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i9-9900K - CA$1.26 vs CA$3.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
217
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.04/FPS
41%
Price, CA$
CA$659
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$659 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4844 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
204
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$257.31
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$257.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4843 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |