Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 880 days newer than Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 20% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-10320 - 214 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 32 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
214
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$676.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$676.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
51.76589303733602%
Multi-Core
4626
23.013780408934878%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |