Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 979 days newer than Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 20% better in Minecraft than Core i3-10320 - 866 vs 723 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 32 vs 8 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
866
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$564.18
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$564.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
56.37362637362637%
Multi-Core
4626
26.865671641791046%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |