Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 199 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 33% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G4900 - 194 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - CA$78.88 vs CA$677.88
- Up to 85% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-9900K - CA$0.54 vs CA$3.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 54 vs 95 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
194
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.49/FPS
15%
Price, CA$
CA$677.88
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$677.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
146
75%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$78.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$78.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |