Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 205 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - CA$49.99 vs CA$600.75
- Up to 91% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-7920X - CA$0.39 vs CA$4.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 5% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G4900 - 135 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
129
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13921 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
135
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.45/FPS
8%
Price, CA$
CA$600.75
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$600.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13922 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |