Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 600 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 7% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 180 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - CA$200.98 vs CA$577.88
- Up to 63% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-9900 - CA$1.19 vs CA$3.21 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
180
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.21/FPS
37%
Price, CA$
CA$577.88
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$577.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
169
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.19/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$200.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$200.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |