Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 22 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 2% better in Saints Row than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 161 vs 158 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 165 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-7940X - 32 vs 28 threads
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
158
98.13664596273291%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$8.82/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1393.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,393.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54510 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
85.47445255474453%
Multi-Core
7539
75.97500755819813%
Intel Core i9-7940X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 16 |
28 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |