Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 1942 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 14% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-7920X - 148 vs 130 FPS
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - CA$178.97 vs CA$600.75
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 60 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for CA$600.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74703 minutes ago
Buy for CA$178.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74702 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 60 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |