Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 221 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 3% better in New World than Ryzen 5 2600X - 114 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - CA$153.99 vs CA$600.75
- Up to 74% better value when playing New World than Core i9-7920X - CA$1.39 vs CA$5.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 95 vs 140 Watts
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
114
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.27/FPS
26%
Price, CA$
CA$600.75
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$600.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
111
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.39/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$153.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |