Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 665 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 2% better in World of Tanks than Core i9-7920X - 540 vs 532 FPS
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - CA$129.0 vs CA$600.75
- Up to 79% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-7920X - CA$0.24 vs CA$1.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 65 vs 140 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$600.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
540
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$129
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |