Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 4388 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 37% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-8150 - 160 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - CA$87.12 vs CA$809.95
- Up to 85% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-14900KF - CA$0.74 vs CA$5.06 per FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
160
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.06/FPS
14%
Price, CA$
CA$809.95
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$809.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
117
73%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900KF | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |