Buy on Amazon
CA$474.95
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $524
Availability
MSRP in USD: $524
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4378 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i7-2600K - 233 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600K - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$151.58 vs CA$474.95
- Up to 65% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i9-13900F - CA$0.72 vs CA$2.04 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
233
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.04/FPS
35%
Price, CA$
CA$474.95
31%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-13900F Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36MB Cache, up to 5.6 GHz
Buy for CA$474.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Core i7-2600K
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
212
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$151.58
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-2600K Quad-Core Processor 3.4 Ghz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I72600K,Black
Buy for CA$151.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Core i7-2600K
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
