Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2094 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 40% better in New World than Ryzen 5 1600X - 153 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$307.08 vs CA$564.18
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for CA$564.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
Buy for CA$307.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
1123
41.13553113553113%
Multi-Core
4766
27.678726987629943%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |