Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2094 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 15% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 1600X - 136 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$302.52 vs CA$474.95
- Up to 27% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-13900F - CA$2.56 vs CA$3.49 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
136
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.49/FPS
73%
Price, CA$
CA$474.95
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$474.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
118
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.56/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$302.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$302.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |