Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3782 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 4% better in Control than FX-4130 - 207 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
207
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.29/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$474.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$474.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |