Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1973 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 260 vs 239 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
239
91.92307692307692%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$885.66
100%
Buy for CA$885.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
43.14664701547532%
Multi-Core
7539
45.89674905637404%
Intel Core i9-13900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |