Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 1189 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 18% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 152 vs 129 FPS
- Up to 52% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$549.99 vs CA$1149.12
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for CA$549.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74704 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
129
84.86842105263158%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1149.12
47%
Buy for CA$1,149.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74704 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
51.516376870198144%
Multi-Core
7454
57.145047531432084%
Intel Core i9-12900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |