Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 3737 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 8% better in Stray than FX-6100 - 189 vs 175 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 24 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - CA$80.8 vs CA$699.99
- Up to 88% better value when playing Stray than Core i9-12900 - CA$0.46 vs CA$3.7 per FPS
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
189
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.7/FPS
12%
Price, CA$
CA$699.99
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$699.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14767 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
175
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$80.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$80.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14759 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 6 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |