Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3894 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 61% better in Starfield than Core i5-760 - 71 vs 44 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - CA$41.21 vs CA$438.62
- Up to 85% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-11900F - CA$0.94 vs CA$6.18 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
71
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.18/FPS
15%
Price, CA$
CA$438.62
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$438.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
44
61%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |