Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10940X outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10940X is 2929 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10940X
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than FX-8150 - 123 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 28 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i9-10940X - CA$93.19 vs CA$1400.0
- Up to 93% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-10940X - CA$0.85 vs CA$11.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10940X - 125 vs 165 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
123
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$11.38/FPS
7%
Price, CA$
CA$1400
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8149 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
110
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.85/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$93.19
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$93.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10940X | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | FX |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 8 |
28 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |