Buy on Amazon
CA$516.85
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $649
Availability
MSRP in USD: $649
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 575 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Rocket League than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 735 vs 710 FPS
- Up to 55% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$516.85 vs CA$1149.12
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 24 vs 20 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Intel Core i9-10900KF (Base Stroke: 3.70GHz; Socket: LGA1200; 125 watt) Box
Buy for CA$516.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75947 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
710
96.5986394557823%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1149.12
44%
AMD YD292XA8AFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Processor 4.3 GHz Max Boost 38MB Cache
Buy for CA$1,149.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75948 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Core i9-10900KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
72.26318774815655%
Multi-Core
7454
81.42888354817566%
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 12 |
| 20 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
