Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2067 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 20% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8370 - 183 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - CA$250.0 vs CA$699.99
- Up to 57% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-10900K - CA$1.64 vs CA$3.83 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
183
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.83/FPS
42%
Price, CA$
CA$699.99
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$699.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7533 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
152
83%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$250
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7533 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | AMD FX-8370 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |