Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 7 2700X - 183 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - CA$375.0 vs CA$720.0
- Up to 44% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-10900K - CA$2.21 vs CA$3.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 105 vs 125 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
183
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.93/FPS
56%
Price, CA$
CA$720
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$720 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
170
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.21/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$375
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |