Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-7600K - 246 vs 243 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - CA$235.0 vs CA$395.99
- Up to 40% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-10900 - CA$0.97 vs CA$1.61 per FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
246
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.61/FPS
60%
Price, CA$
CA$395.99
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$395.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
243
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$235
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Core i5-7600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |