Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7600K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$150.75 vs CA$564.18
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 17% better in No Man's Sky than Core i5-7600K - 207 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 32 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$150.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
Buy for CA$564.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1507
55.201465201465204%
Multi-Core
4226
24.54265636796562%
Intel Core i5-7600K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
91 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |