Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2067 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 17% better in Ready or Not than FX-8370 - 275 vs 236 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - CA$321.92 vs CA$414.92
- Up to 10% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i9-10900 - CA$1.36 vs CA$1.51 per FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
275
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.51/FPS
90%
Price, CA$
CA$414.92
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$414.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
236
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.36/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$321.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$321.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | AMD FX-8370 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |