Buy on Amazon
CA$321.92
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $219
Availability
MSRP in USD: $219
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms the more expensive FX-8370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 952 days newer than the more expensive FX-8370.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8370 - 199 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 22% cheaper than FX-8370 - CA$250.0 vs CA$321.92
- Up to 25% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8370 - CA$1.26 vs CA$1.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 12 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
AMD FX-8370 Black Edition 8 Core CPU Processor AM3+ 4300Mhz 125W 16MB FD8370FRHKBOX
Buy for CA$321.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
199
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$250
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 65W AM4 Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler (YD1600BBAFBOX)
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FX-8370
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
