Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10885H outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10885H is 3095 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10885H
- Performs up to 35% better in Dirt 5 than FX-8150 - 187 vs 139 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
139
74%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$93.19
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$93.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5413 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10885H | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |