Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9800X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9800X is 435 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9800X
- Performs up to 8% better in League of Legends than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 166 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 165 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-9800X - CA$890.53 vs CA$3200.92
- Up to 70% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i7-9800X - CA$5.78 vs CA$19.28 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9800X - 32 vs 16 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
166
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$19.28/FPS
29.979253112033195%
Price, CA$
CA$3200.92
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$3,200.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3683 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
154
92.7710843373494%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.78/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$890.53
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$890.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3682 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
85.59941520467837%
Multi-Core
7539
100%
Intel Core i7-9800X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |