Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 16 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 205 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 60% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$457.88 vs CA$1149.12
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700K - 24 vs 8 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for CA$457.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75229 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
199
97.07317073170731%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1149.12
39%
Buy for CA$1,149.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75230 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |