Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Core i7-930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 2720 days newer than Core i7-930.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-930
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-930 - 239 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-930 - 32 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
239
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.73/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$890.53
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$890.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6359 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 28th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 28th, 2010
Single-Core
416
35.52519214346712%
Multi-Core
1424
18.888446743599946%
Intel Core i7-930 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Feb 28th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Bloomfield | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |